Banner

Search Telecare Aware

Like it? Share it!

Our Definitions

Telecare Aware posts pointers to news items that have a broad range of interest. Authors of those items often use terms 'telecare' and telehealth' in inventive and ideosyncratic ways. Telecare Aware's editors can generally live with that variation. However, when we use these terms we usually mean:

Telecare: from simple personal alarms (AKA pendant/panic/medical/social alarms, PERS, and so on) through to smart homes that focus on alerts for risk including, for example: falls; smoke; changes in daily activity patterns and 'wandering'. Telecare may also be used to confirm that someone is safe and to prompt them to take medication. The alert generates an appropriate response to the situation allowing someone to live more independently, and confidently, in their own home for longer.

Telehealth: as in remote vital signs monitoring. This usually, but not exclusively, benefits patients with long term conditions.

Telecare Aware's editors concentrate on what we perceive to be significant events and technological and other developments in telecare and telehealth. We make no apology for being independent and opinionated or for trying to be interesting rather than comprehensive.

history project advert

For Telecare Aware in your own language, click here.

alvolution Advertise here

Telecare Aware News Network

Telecare Aware Local Sites with news particular to each location

Live Now Live Soon

Australia
Canada
England
France
Ireland
Portugal
Rising Countries
Scotland
Wales

Italia
Norway

Interested in being an editor? Read this.

Link to archived news storiesLink to archived news stories

Supporting

supporting the 3 million lives campaign

Recommended

Editor Steve recently finished reading these two books and recommends them. The first, Klondike Playboy is an autobiography by John Boden, known in this industry as CEO of ElderIssues, Florida, and the second, Pitch Anything, by Oren Klaff is essential reading these days for anyone who has to sell new product ideas. Let's just say you won't want these techniques used against you!

And then, of course, there are the perpetual favourites that everyone in every equipment supplier company should read over and over again, by Geoffrey A Moore.

Also - Steve's add-ins for PowerPoint for Windows

And - Steve's App Store for Office (free download)

3millionlives. A cartel in the making? (UK)

Friday, 17 February 2012 07:59

Cartel: A cartel is a formal (explicit) agreement among competing firms. [An agreement that has the effect of 'fixing' the market. Cartels are illegal in most countries.] (Wikipedia)

Last week I (editor Steve) highlighted some concerns about the way the UK's fledgling 3millionlives (3ML) campaign is shaping up, particularly in the matter of the MOU the Working Group expects companies to sign and the initial £10,000 cost of entry - with an uncapped commitment after that. I asked for comments from people who could make a positive case for the initiative. The comments so far - thank you - have been lukewarm. If you have not yet read the earlier item, read it first.

I have had private comments from some companies who were understandably reluctant to comment publicly. In summary, the concerns they expressed were... [Read more...]

  • This is difficult...you don't want to be seen to be against an initiative that is supposed to help, but we are not at all happy with how it is going.
  • We ran the MOU past our lawyers, who advised us not to sign it.
  • We volunteered to help the project when it was first mooted but not only have we not heard back, we were not even sent the invitation documents you published.
  • We think this is a Tunstall-driven scheme which has come about as the result of its Parliamentary lobbying activities.
  • Why is only industry being asked to foot the bill? Some of these other organisations that are being invited [universities and charities] are quite well funded.
  • Who is really going to benefit? Only the PR companies, I suspect.
  • We won't be participating. The £10,000 is a small price for the big companies but it's a large proportion of our net profits. Then there is the unknown future financial commitment. It looks like an exercise by the large companies to exclude the smaller ones from the market. If they establish the 3ML branding in the NHS as representing 'trusted' or 'government approved' suppliers then the effect will have been to create a market that excludes us. In effect, it's a cartel.

And Medilink's press release on 3ML does nothing to dispel the misgivings: "Medilink UK's Chairman Tony Davis added: 'As well as the millions of lives that will be improved through this initiative, there are many Medilink members who stand to benefit hugely from the ‘3millionlives' campaign. As growing SMEs, they really want the doors to the NHS to be opened, and for healthcare professionals to be actively seeking telehealth and telecare solutions. By joining together, and by working with the Department of Health, they will be in the ideal position to take commercial advantage of the opportunities as they become available.'"

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Archives: List of all latest news items | Telecare/Telehealth Stories April 2005 - April 2006
Telecare/Telehealth Stories May 2006 - Dec 2008

Advertise on this site. It features news stories about telecare, telehealth, telemedicine and remote patient monitoring
Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Effective website design and consultancy