Banner

Search Telecare Aware

If You Like It...Share It!

Facebook MySpace Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Google Bookmarks RSS Feed 
For Telecare Aware in your own language, click here.

If you can spare just 5 minutes a week, then Telecare Aware will keep you right up to date with the world of telehealth and telecare
THERE IS NO CHARGE FOR THIS SERVICE

Yes, we know you didn't get up today thinking "I must sign up for some more emails", but if you want to be kept right up-to-date in the field of telecare and telehealth, you should... At least it is simple and painless.

Enter your details in the boxes below, click the 'Notify Me' button and you will get a twice-weekly email listing Telecare Aware updates. We'll never pass your details to anyone else and you can easily opt out.

Steve Hards and Donna Cusano
Editors, Telecare Aware

PS If the email alerts you signed up for previously have stopped arriving, read this.

Enter your name

and email address


"I find very interesting articles from the emails that you send. It's a great service you provide. Thanks for scouring the world for news of interest to us in this field."
Mark Gottlieb, President, LogicMark
.

You can also:
follow Telecare Aware via Twitter
• follow via Facebook
• view it on your internet-enabled mobile phone
• add to iGoogle Add to Google
• read 10 other ways to monitor updates

ta logo

Link to archived news stories

Link to archived news stories

'Panic button' failed dying father

PDF E-mail
Wednesday, 24 June 2009 06:00
A North Texas family is suing ADT because their father's wrist-worn 'panic button' system failed and was not replaced immediately. They allege that as a result he was unable to summon help as he lay dying. Story from WFAA.com.
 
Comments (3)
1 Sunday, 28 June 2009 09:23
David Carter

It is a shame the gentleman in question died. However surely common sense also applies. If a person is at high risk then in the absence of their alarm he should have had 24hr care.


How many panic type alarm systems are not working at anyone time I wonder? This is the reason to encourage the resident to test on a regular basis. Weekly should be a minimum.


As you get no advanced warning of a failure. As for the argument the devices should self test/ more robust, yes all this is achievable but at a cost and how many councils would want the increased cost.


 

2 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 19:40
Donna Cusano

If you read it, the man was found by his wife on the floor, dead. It does not say how much time passed between his being seen as "fine" and then; if there were signs of struggle; quite conceivably he could have had a massive stroke or coronary and was dead in a minute. No PERS would have helped. It looks to me as if the courts will decide liability on this.


When I was with my previous company (Living Independently) we had estimates that PERS buttons failed to work about 1/3 of the time. However we based this on failure to press the alert (e.g. the senior was not wearing the button in bed, the shower etc. or was not near the box), fell down unconscious, or was too stunned or incapable of pushing the button when down, not actual malfunction.

3 Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:09
Terry Asbury

We are all going to die. The idea/concept that 'somebody has to pay' upon death is one of the greatest examples of why our country is going down the tubes. Damn lawyers. And damn those greedy enough to want to make money on the inevitable!

Leave a comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification:

Archives: List of all latest news items | Telecare/Telehealth Stories April 2005 - April 2006
Telecare/Telehealth Stories May 2006 - Dec 2008

Advertise on this site. It features news stories about telecare, telehealth, telemedicine and remote patient monitoring
Sitemap | WebEffectiveWeb: Website design and consultancy