Banner

Response to Dirty Tactics (Small Supplier)

Wednesday, 11 November 2009 23:11
In response to Small Supplier (comment 6 above) I guess I'd better justify the item... although I think the number and content of the comments are probably justification enough.

One reason for raising this is that I thought it is about time the complaints I've been hearing privately over the years got an airing, because anti-competitive behaviour, in addition to any legal implications for the perpetrators, is in no one's long term interest.

A more personal reason is that I've been approached a number of times recently by companies asking how they can break into the UK market. That's a difficult one to answer, for reasons most readers will appreciate. Now I will be able to point them to this post and they can start to piece together an answer to the question for themselves.

As for being brave and naming names, I suspect it must be a mystery to US-based readers why this isn't happening as it certainly would on a US site. Well, you have to remember that in the UK there is no 'First Amendment' to guarantee freedom of speech and of the press and so people commenting here are rightly nervous of sticking their heads too far above the parapet.

In the UK, to 'name and shame' you have to be either foolhardy, wealthy, or an MP speaking under Parliamentary privilege. London has become known as the capital of 'libel tourism'. See Times reports here and here.

 

Archives: List of all latest news items | Telecare/Telehealth Stories April 2005 - April 2006
Telecare/Telehealth Stories May 2006 - Dec 2008

Advertise on this site. It features news stories about telecare, telehealth, telemedicine and remote patient monitoring
Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Effective website design and consultancy