|
Get on our soapbox and sound off about your telecare or telehealth issues!
|
|
Monday, 21 May 2012 21:44 |
|
Jacques von Speyer, CEO of US Tele-Medicine reflects on his recent experience of talking to industry leaders at the ATA conference.
I was at the ATA conference a couple of weeks ago and found a certain commonality; no one is making money right now in telemedicine. Of all the device vendors, both the new ones from Korea, Taiwan, China, Israel, France and Switzerland, to the branded names like Intel, GE, AT&T, Bosch, Honeywell and the others, not one of them has produced an important single flow of income.
The entire industry seems to be waiting for some payor or another to step forward and be the first to implement a national system of sufficient proportions to kick start telemedicine in the USA. One difficulty to achieving that is the fact that US industries and governments are in abeyance until the election, and the prospect of redefining how someone approaches healthcare and its delivery, based on an uncertain economic indicators, is difficult. Entities are comfortable with the status-quo and after all, eventually, everyone seems to be receiving healthcare irrespective of cost or time involved. So where is the incentive to change? It appears that not even the inherent savings appropriated in most telemedicine programs is enough of a motivator to push telemedicine along in the USA.
Basically we are all waiting for the 'eventuality' to take place, and it will. The challenge for most, however, is to stick around long enough to benefit from it.
Jacques von Speyer US Tele-Medicine
|
|
|
Tuesday, 01 May 2012 07:58 |
|
Independent consultant cardiologist Dr Lance Forbat, whose work using telehealth monitoring Telecare Aware has reported a number of times, responds to the recent headline on the Mayo Clinic study that telehealth monitoring appeared to treble death rates and points out that in comparing monitoring people at home with and without telehealth monitoring they were not comparing like-for-like.
If I do a twice daily ward round on my patients and look at the physiological signs recorded by the nurse and take a history, possibly pick up on unnoticed issues that my years of experience detect, I would like to think I make an impact on the outcome of patients' illnesses as well as their sense of well being...
|
|
Friday, 27 April 2012 06:45 |
|
Editor Steve Hards asks if it is time for a reconsideration of the role of the Telecare Services Association (TSA).
With yesterday's news of the draft EU Telehealth Code of Practice (including telecare) some of the TSA's members are wondering why it is about to spend up to £25,000 of their money developing one of its own to extend its existing Telecare Code of Practice.
But there is a deeper question that they and the TSA Board members should be considering...
|
|
Tuesday, 13 March 2012 02:37 |
|
Editor Donna muses on the link in the telecare chain where it can all fall down - the person who is expected to use the device.
"If you build it, they will come"--misattributed to the film Field of Dreams, 1989
We can get telehealth and mhealth into the home care or healthcare provider, payer, 'app store' or 'ecosystem' (the 'push'), but you cannot force the client or patient to use it.
The buzz may be about how slick a system or app is, how to sell it to the C-suite or even the Four Big Questions, but have we forgotten someone? We assume that end users/clients/patients will be delighted to use our wonderful devices, in the way they should be used--consistently, correctly, continuously until they... expire. Step back and think about human behavior, however, and you realize...that cannot be true.
|
|
Monday, 27 February 2012 09:30 |
|
After my (editor Steve's) comment about 'fairy dust' (3millionlives: Plan B and Plan C) certain Telecare Aware readers asked where is my Plan D? It is not fully formed, but here's the outline.
The key is to get the Department of Health (DH) to exert some monetary influence.
However, we know that in view of the savings the public sector is going to have to make over the next 5 years (£20 billion for the NHS alone) DH is not going to come up with any new funding…[read more]
|
|
Thursday, 02 February 2012 08:39 |
|
Guy Dewsbury, Managing Director of gdewsbury, which is a freelance specialist technology writing service and consultancy, takes a thoughtful look at data security in telecare call centres and asks a few pertinent questions.
Let me state at the off that there are some really great call centres that I have been privileged to work with and some others I have become acquainted with that deserve high praise.
That said, when you pick up the phone and speak to your bank, you feel protected...
|
|
Tuesday, 13 December 2011 10:21 |
This Soapbox is published anonymously for someone who wished to express some observations and feedback for the conference organisers and the TSA membership without compromising his company. Please note Telecare Aware's Anonymity Policy (Soapbox Section right sidebar).
Given the economic climate, TSA will undoubtedly report excellent results for its 2011 conference. And with so many corporate sponsors, it will certainly have been a great financial success. But careful analysis of the attendees listed reveals a concerning trend
|
|
Tuesday, 06 December 2011 23:42 |
|
If 'ignorance of the law is no excuse' telehealth commissioners and providers have a responsibility to make sure that in matters of medical devices all regulations - many of them legal requirements - are being adhered to. Failure to do so on one side or the other implies a willingness to be complicit in their breaking and it unfairly tilts the market against those companies that abide by the rules.
This Soapbox item is timely given that there is due to be a big push for telehealth in the UK on the back of the WSD programme results. It is written by an experienced professional in the telehealth field who, because of his or her position cannot reveal his or her identity. It will also become obvious to readers why he or she cannot name the 'guilty parties'. However, there are questions at the end which service commissioners should now use to identify whether they are dealing with a company that is breaking the regulations.
There is now no excuse for either the companies involved not to correct the situation or for commissioners to continue to put their investment of public money at risk.
Steve Hards, Editor
Readers who prefer to read this long item as a PDF can download it here.
While the world holds its breath waiting for the imminent final revelation of the Department of Health's Whole System Demonstrators (WSD) results, the global mass of telecare and telehealth manufacturers, distributors, resellers and newcomers are revving up their trucks full of boxes and briefing their marketing departments - all believing that a 'tsunami of sales' are just around the corner!
Storm brewing...
|
|
Friday, 28 October 2011 07:52 |
|
Editor Steve asks why we still see tendering fiascos when so much experienced support is available.
The UK has a long history of both legislation and experience in relation to the procurement of publicly funded services. There is a veritable industry of advisers, consultants and lawyers who can be consulted on how to manage the process to stay legal and to get an effective result. Why then do we still see some tendering fiascos?
For example, there was…
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 6 |